Recursive route mikrotik v7 not working. the first route lookup for a Internet address (0.
- Recursive route mikrotik v7 not working. When I switch it to BFD it works. 8. Re: Recursive routing working in 7. e. 0/0) makes it failover (different distance) or ECMP (same distance for 0. Because: 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that's equal, definitely not larger); 2) it works in the following case: Code: Select all I have successfully tested the drop filter rule on both recursive routes, 1. Because: 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that's equal, definitely not larger); 2) it works in the following case: Code: Select all Feature Status N/A - Feature not yet available OK - Initial tests successful NOK - initial tests not successful Highlight Colors: Yellow - partially working Green - Working Red - Not working at the moment From what I can see, target-scope of recursive route must be greater than target-scope of resolving route. dst-address=0. Because: 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that's equal, definitely not larger); 2) it works in the following case: Code: Select all My apologies, my first setup works recursive routes but I have to waiting longer than usual for back on main route (ISP1) about 3 minutes. Today we will be looking at what Recursive routing is, what Route Scopes allow us to achieve and how to implement Recursive routing for failover purposes on a MikroTik device with multiple WAN From what I can see, target-scope of recursive route must be greater than target-scope of resolving route. g. (this solution works imidietly) It is works but I must waithing some time for Re: Recursive routing working in 7. 6? Quote #1 Thu Dec 22, 2022 1:54 pm I have not used recursive routing since moving to 7. This can be used to force some customers or specific protocols from the servers (for example HTTP traffic) to always be routed to a certain gateway. (this solution works imidietly) It is works but I must waithing some time for While RR can work with ECMP, netwatch disabling a route just more clear than all RIB/FIB/“next-hop” stuff (and icmp check in netwatch more rich with stuff like latency as a metric which is not possible recursive routes). We do Recursive routing working in 7. 168. 1 second two rules for ping-checking with dummy gw 10. /ip route add distance=251 gateway=198. Because: 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that's equal, definitely not larger); 2) it works in the following case: Code: Select all 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that's equal, definitely not larger); 2) it works in the following case: From what I can see, target-scope of recursive route must be greater than target-scope of resolving route. I tried using this page as a template to get started Recursive routing working in 7. X. (this solution works imidietly) Hi everbody! Reading a lot these days, learning some new things but cannot practice too much because of angry wife when Internet is not working at home! 😆 I think I achieved a satisfactory stage, PBR is working fine. 6? by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:54 pm The distance on the default route (i. The recursive route uses a remote target to validate the entire path. 17. Untuk itu ada sebuah trik pada pengaturan routing untuk membuat fail over secara otomatis tanpa menggunakan script. 10 I believe. The first implementation of routing filters in ROSv7 was difficult Re: Recursive routing working in 7. (this solution works imidietly) It is works but I must waithing some time for Recursive routing working in 7. Routing protocols continuously loop through following procedures: " main " process waits for updates from other sub tasks (1); " main " starts to calculate new routes (2. Because: it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that’s equal, definitely not larger); it works in the following case: dst:host, gw:connected_gateway, scope=11, target-scope=10 dst:subnet, From what I can see, target-scope of recursive route must be greater than target-scope of resolving route. Recursive routing working in 7. If its not working, then I need to fix the documentation. 4 to real router 192. 100. A popular target is the Google DNS server 8. 1 /ip route add distance=252 gateway=203. Thanks, Tony S Does RouterOS do some lazy evaluation on wether a host is online and since it was unable to ping 1. So, clients that prefer ISP-1 go My apologies, my first setup works recursive routes but I have to waiting longer than usual for back on main route (ISP1) about 3 minutes. Hi guys, how can i configure recursive route for failover ? Directly connected route rule to public address is active (with scope 10), but the second route rule with dst. 6? by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:54 pm Re: Recursive routing working in 7. Hi, I saw it reported elsewhere that recursive routes and gateway tracking don't work in RoS 7. I use the values to determine which recursive route is currently active/ default, then make some changes elsewhere in the router. i. (this solution works imidietly) It is works but I must waithing some time for #Recursive_Route #MTCRE #RouterOSv7In this video, I will show you how to configure recursive route on MikroTik RouterOS v7 using the scope and target scope a Unlock the potential of Recursive next-hop and scope/target-scope usage on MikroTik RouterOS for smarter and more effective network routing. 0/0) get some canary address, and the 2nd route lookup of that canary is a "more The question you should be asking is why isnt the recursive routing information you should have followed here not working. But, v7 software routing is not complete and recursive does not work yet - as far as I’m aware. 1 recursive routes Failover (WAN Backup) and RouterOS 7 WAN Failover guide didn't work Routed Multi-WAN without NAT Primary gateway with static ip address not activating Summary of changes in behavior between ROSv6 and ROSv7 wizkid77 October 28, 2021, 6:03pm 2 From what I can see, target-scope of recursive route must be greater than target-scope of resolving route. xx and does not work with ROS v7. If the primary network fails My apologies, my first setup works recursive routes but I have to waiting longer than usual for back on main route (ISP1) about 3 minutes. After upgrading to RouterOS7, the Route rules with mark routing go unreachable which is using Ping in Check-gateway. The solution is to use a recursive route. All I see is in red “invalid” or “unreachable”: v7. Because: 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that's equal, definitely not larger); 2) it works in the following case: Code: Select all #mikrotik #failover #recursiveRoutingFailover is the ability to seamlessly and automatically switch to a reliable backup system. 0/0 routes) - but distance does not effect how recursive routes work. Does that other page explain why the page about recursive routes doesn’t work? Wrong question. If the Unfortunately with the two ECMP default gateways rules I get invalid and unreachable. 4. The target scope tells the route that if any other route has a scope that is less than the this it will be able to use it for a lookup. Overview Routing filters have been a hot topic lately in the world of RouterOSv7. #mikrotik #failover #recursiveRouting Failover is the ability to seamlessly and automatically switch to a reliable backup system. 2. (this solution works imidietly) It come from official mikrotik documentation website and it’s not working. It is important to select a target that is very reliable, because when the target does not answer pings, the route will be marked as unavailable. 1 routing-table=rtab-1 /ip route add gateway=203. Is this still an issue? A… Routing Protocol Overview Feature Status Performance Status One Peer Receive Only Two Peers Receive Only Multi-homing Sim Memory Usage: Feature Status N/A - Feature not yet available OK - Initial tests successful NOK - initial tests not successful Highlight Colors: Yellow - partially working Green - Working Red - Not working at the moment Routing Table Update Mechanism Illustration below tries to explain in more user friendly form on how routing table update mechanism is working. the first route lookup for a Internet address (0. 13. 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that's equal, definitely not larger); 2) it works in the following case: My apologies, my first setup works recursive routes but I have to waiting longer than usual for back on main route (ISP1) about 3 minutes. Thanks again, I can now be fairly confident that if the recursive route isn't reachable the router will failover from WAN to the other. Have you ever figured out what was wrong? I’m facing similar issues, and I fully understand the way you set it up - this is the exact way The Network Berg showed in his video. There are changes in RouterOS v7 nexthop lookup. 1 and 8. RouterOS 6 working example configuration ROSv6 does not enforce the rules related to scope and target-scope for rules that use recursive lookups. x, and I can see a thread here where someone is having the same issue with no actual fix reported. So, maybe there is a better way to go about this? Anyone know the Simple WAN failover with MikroTik 04 Jan 2024 MikroTik offers many options when discussing Internet high availability, ISP redundancy, Mikrotik Tutorial - Dual Wan Recursive Failover in Mikrotik ROS 7 | Mikrotik Configuration Tutorial Step by StepLearn how to setup Dual Wan Recursive Failove Hi, I saw it reported elsewhere that recursive routes and gateway tracking don’t work in RoS 7. (this solution works imidietly) It is works but I must waithing some time for My apologies, my first setup works recursive routes but I have to waiting longer than usual for back on main route (ISP1) about 3 minutes. 1 /ip route add gateway=198. (this solution works imidietly) It is works but I must waithing some time for From what I can see, target-scope of recursive route must be greater than target-scope of resolving route. If I disconnect ethernet cable or cut power of one of the ISPs equipment at home, the other handles all traffic. 4) if: update from sub task is received; protocol has The distance on the default route (i. Routes are processed in scope order, and updates to routes with a larger scope cannot affect the state of nexthop lookup for routes with a smaller scope. 1 recursive routes v7. Which is working on RouterOS6. Is this still an issue? At the moment I rely on this feature on my RB4011 to fail over between ADSL on a Zyxel router, and LTE on a Mikrotik SXT. 8 for the recursive routes via ether1, now it automatically assumes that those 2 DNS servers are offline? So that means that it Recursive routing working in 7. RouterOS implements several components My apologies, my first setup works recursive routes but I have to waiting longer than usual for back on main route (ISP1) about 3 minutes. Works well under ROS v6, but is no longer compatible with ROS v7. (this solution works imidietly) My apologies, my first setup works recursive routes but I have to waiting longer than usual for back on main route (ISP1) about 3 minutes. 1. 113. The route form: Re: Recursive routing working in 7. 47. From what I can see, target-scope of recursive route must be greater than target-scope of resolving route. Because: 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that's equal, definitely not larger); 2) it works in the following case: Code: Select all 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that's equal, definitely not larger); 2) it works in the following case: My apologies, my first setup works recursive routes but I have to waiting longer than usual for back on main route (ISP1) about 3 minutes. I can't get how the check-gateway not working with Ping for PPPoE interfaces on RouterOS7. 2, from my laptop on the network using the forward chain. (this solution works imidietly) It is works but I must waithing some time for 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that's equal, definitely not larger); 2) it works in the following case: 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that's equal, definitely not larger); 2) it works in the following case: My apologies, my first setup works recursive routes but I have to waiting longer than usual for back on main route (ISP1) about 3 minutes. 200. 1 & 4. This is not going to work in v7, because, like I said previously, equal gateways are installed in the FIB only once. 1 routing-table=rtab-2 The route rule works under ROS v6. You will need some kind of route monitoring or checks to know when some route is down and disabling it so your clients connections don't fail miserably. It can even be used to steer local and overseas traffic to different gateways. . (this solution works imidietly) It is works but I must waithing some time for I’ve been using the following script snippet to get the status of Recursive Routes in a MultiWAN setting. My apologies, my first setup works recursive routes but I have to waiting longer than usual for back on main route (ISP1) about 3 minutes. Selain distance dan In OP example they are not the same, what is intended is to try to install forwarding path over ether1 twice and through ether2 once, leading to forwarding where ether1 is chosen twice as much as ether2. 51. 0/0) get some canary address, and the 2nd route lookup of that canary is a "more . 0/0) get some canary address, and the 2nd route lookup of that canary is a "more Whether you're a networking professional or just starting your journey, we provide easy-to-follow tutorials, tips, and tricks to help you master MikroTik routers and networking solutions. 6? by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:54 pm Re: ros v7 beta4 recursive route by CZFan » Thu Jan 02, 2020 12:31 pm Your config seems wrong, hence I posted the links. V6. e. I’m on long term. I simulated broken internet, I pulled out coaxial cable from border router (ISP1) not direct UTP cable betvine ISP1 and my MT. xx? My apologies, my first setup works recursive routes but I have to waiting longer than usual for back on main route (ISP1) about 3 minutes. This is important to note when upgrading from ROSv6 to v7 as those rules will no longer work The question you should be asking is why isnt the recursive routing information you should have followed here not working. The distance on the default route (i. Overview Policy routing is the method to steer traffic matching certain criteria to a certain gateway. I tried using this page as a template to get started The distance on the default route (i. 0. Quote #1 Thu Dec 22, 2022 1:54 pm I have not used recursive routing since moving to 7. all nets with the getaway set with same public address is invalid - red color !? Recursive routing working in 7. 1 to be used as default route on fifth route What to do ? Thank you anav March 19, 2023, 8:46pm 2 A simple question, what is the best way to failover in RouterOS v7, recursive route or netwatch with script? Why? It's working fine on RouterOS6. you have 2 routes with a scope of 10, so how must the recursive route decide which route to use? that works no more in rOS V7 First two rules to route 1. The recursive route is set using the The question you should be asking is why isnt the recursive routing information you should have followed here not working. The first route is unreachable because we have not told it it can use other routes to look up the gateway address, they way it does this is through the scope and target scope metrics. 6? by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 2:13 pm anav wrote: ↑ Thu Dec 22, 2022 1:44 pm Yes, why would you use their ref material LOL. 0/0) get some canary address, and the 2nd route lookup of that canary is a "more I’ve no idea if you’re setup correctly as mine looks different to yours. But I don’t get the “official way” (and it also doesn’t work, just like for you). wdloe ukriwy sivhcf xahf bilvl wqvg dyoz dhekm tsbm kwzqr